Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'well'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • News
    • Forum Feedback
  • Arc Hydro Groundwater
    • Using AHGW
  • GMS
    • Using GMS
    • GMS Feature Requests
    • MODFLOW
  • SMS
    • Using SMS
    • Hydraulic Models
    • Wave Modeling
    • Other Models
    • SMS News
    • FHWA - SMS User
  • WMS
    • Using WMS
    • General Hydrology
    • Urban Hydrology
    • Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling
    • WMS Feature Requests
    • FHWA - WMS User

Calendars

There are no results to display.


Found 3 results

  1. When the "Create Particles at Wells" command is used, GMS could have the starting locations remember the name of the well that they were created around and include that information in the Pathline Report.
  2. Grouping Particle set by wells

    Hi, Is there a way to "flag" particle generated by Modpath to the well they come from? I'm using Modpath to evaluate residence time for 50 wells. I'm using 100 to 300 particle per well. It would be convenient if i could track back from which well the particle are from in the pathline report of GMS. Sylvain
  3. Dear all, I am modelling a pair of extraction/injection wells and have noticed something very peculiar when varying the horizontal conductivity values of certain layers. I have attached two pics to this post. In my model, the top layer consists of 3 distinct layers which represent an aquitard (clay). Extraction and injection is occurring in the lower 5th layer. In the 2 figures the horizontal k-value for each of the top three layers are displayed. The only difference between the two figures is that the middle layer's conductivity value has been changed from 0.01 to 5 m/d. All layers have a vertical anisotropy of 1. As can be observed in the figures, the one with the higher conductivty value for the middel layer (k = 5 m/d) gives a smaller change in head at the surface. You can see the 0.05 m contour line staying beneath the surface. In the other figure, both the 0.05 and 0.1 contours reach the surface implying a change in head by that amount at the surface. It is logical that when you deal with aquitards less water can pass through this layer, yet in these figures the oppossite is true. Can anyone explain this difference to me? Thank you for any insight
×