Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

WetStone (Daniel S Fisher)

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About WetStone (Daniel S Fisher)

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://wetstonesolutions.com
  • ICQ
    0
  • Yahoo
    wetstone

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Pittsburgh Area

Recent Profile Visitors

1,669 profile views
  1. This is a hot topic and I see no response from Aquaveo... Is GMS compatible with Windows 10? You're falling behind the curve very quickly.
  2. Great. I'll be watching to see any new developments!
  3. Also, Visual Modflow claims to have parallel capability with MT3DMS. Is this merely with the reaction calculation?
  4. That's kind of surprising considering the work done 13 years ago: Parallel Processing of a Groundwater Contaminant Code by R. C. Arnett and L. E. Greenwade, May 22-26, 2000 at the 42nd Annual Cray User Group Meeting. They did determine that ~95% of the cpu time was spent in the advection calculation. Maybe they have completed the code optimization themselves. Get the pdf article here: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CEEQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inl.gov%2Ftechnicalpublications%2FDocuments%2F2690197.pdf&ei=5b8XUtSiEbih4AO2qIDIBw&usg=AFQjCNHVz9uVzfYz1e8yoF5tuana0N1Pnw&sig2=nf6u8CayMJBCiYWwhkUn1w
  5. I don't think I have to describe this very much. We all know what this means - faster run times! Does GMS plan to utilize parallel computing for multiple cores for its version of MT3DMS anytime soon?
  6. Does MT3DMS use the parallel computation on multiple cores? If not, do you have plans to add that capability? Those transport run times are substantially longer than any flow modeling.
×
×
  • Create New...