Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

Saubhagya Singh

Members
  • Content Count

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Saubhagya Singh

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 12/23/1991

Contact Methods

  • Skype
    saubhagya.rathore

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Atlanta (GA), USA
  • Interests
    Research Interests:
    - Groundwater Modelling
    - Numerical simulation using FDM and Mesh-free technique
    - Fate and Transport of Contaminants in Sub-surface Flows
    - Numerical and Analytical Modelling of Transport Processes
    - Seawater Intrusion
    - Numerical and Analytical Modelling of Density Driven Flows

    My hobbies include playing frisbee, horse-riding, mentoring people, listening Sufi and Marwari folk music

Recent Profile Visitors

4,686 profile views
  1. Dear Forum Members, I am trying to perform Monte-Carlo simulation in a vertical slice of the aquifer (x-z plane). I want to generate around 100 realizations of the spatially-correlated hydraulic-conductivity random field in 2D (x-z plane). Then I want to solve flow and transport for each realization and analyze the ensemble of results. I explored options in GMS and this is what I found out (correct me if I am wrong): 1) Stochastic Modeling Option: It is not possible to generate 2D field (spatially varying K values) using this option. 2) Interpolation using 2D Scatter Point Tool: This only allows to generate conditional realizations (kriging). I couldn't see a way to generate unconditional realizations. Also, this tool works only in plane view, hence random field can be generated only in the x-y plane. I want to generate fields in x-z plane. Hence, it seems my only option is to generate K fields outside of GMS, importing K fields and solving cases one by one. Please, let me know if there is any other efficient way to perform this. Thank You Saubhagya
  2. Good Morning Forum Members, Is it possible to import a 2D (x-z plane) K field for a vertical slice of a heterogeneous aquifer? Or my only option is to paste layer-by-layer values in the LPF package? Thank You Saubhagya
  3. Ah! Now "Rewetted" makes sense to me. Don't know how I missed that haha! Thank you so much!
  4. The figure in my previous comment shows the result when no rewetting was required as initial heads were equal to the higher boundary-head. But in the case where I have initial heads equal to lower boundary-head, the cells near the higher-head boundary never get wetted. I will try some more combinations of wetting parameters.
  5. Hi Michael, Thank you for your answer. Yes, I also think that. I did not have rewetting on. However, I tried various combinations of rewetting parameters but nothing helped. Finally, I had initial heads set to higher boundary-head, which then did not require rewetting and it worked (Figure attached). However, do you have any suggestion how can I have rewetting enabled? I used the wetting parameter as low as 0.01 still rewetting did not happen.
  6. Here is an example of a single-density flow width domain length as 53 cm, hydraulic conductivity as 20 cm/min and boundary heads as 21 cm and 22 cm. Theoretical calculation based on Darcy's law yields 8.11 cm^2/min, however, the flow budget in the model described below shows 7.9186 cm^2/min as the flow near the inland boundary which is exactly the value we would obtain if we consider a confined aquifer of thickness 21 cm and other parameters same as above. This suggests that flow budget does not account for the flow above the elevation equal to the lower boundary head. Also, there are not velocity vector generated in that region. Any guidance on how to proceed to get the accurate flow budget for the unconfined aquifers will be helpful.
  7. Dear community members, I am trying to numerically evaluate the discharge in an unconfined coastal aquifer with a constant head as the inland boundary. After performing SEAWAT simulation, the flow rate value in the flow-budget for any cross-section close to the inland boundary reflects only the flow below the sea-level. I also confirmed this by plotting velocity-vector plot, in which there were no velocities plotted in the region above the sea-level and below the water table. I have attached the picture for clarity. Is there a way I can get the total value of the freshwater discharge in the aquifer? I believe, a simple single-density flow model would also have a similar issue with the flow-budget in the unconfined case.
  8. Thank you Bill for the reply. Is there any workaround to this for now? Like, will splitting that one row/column into two of half of the original widths work? Or, are any of the older version free from this bug? Regards Saubhagya
  9. Hello respected members, The problem mentioned by me in the question above is still unresolved. I tried running MODFLOW model on both 2000 and 2005 version. The problem can also be seen in the example files provided in the Goswami/Clement Experiment** (http://www.aquaveo.com/software/gms-learning-tutorials). I tried changing few things but nothing helped. ANy help in this regard would be really appreciated. Thanks and Regards Saubhagya
  10. Dear members, I am trying to generate velocity vectors in a density dependent model. The GMS is displaying error, pic of which is attached below. I have been generating velocity vectors and never faced any such problem. I am not able to work out solution to this problem. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You
  11. Hi, It might be very basic question but I am struggling with it. Is there a feature in GMS to display streamlines after MODFLOW simulation? Thank You Saubhagya
  12. or I think, even exporting a particular contour line should also work for me. Is it possible?
  13. Good Morning, I tried doing this but couldn't find the right file to do this? Basically the task for me would be to find the location of cell with a specific concentration in the lower most layer of the aquifer, at each timestep. So the file having data of concentration in each cells at each timestep should work for me. Thank You Saubhagya
×
×
  • Create New...