Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

Petra Furychova

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Petra Furychova

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi Bruce, can I ask you if you find out the solution for this issue? I am having probably very similar problem: I have observation values from different piezometers for which varies the filter depth. Different filterdepths falls into different modelling layers, therefore I look for solution how to obtain the residuals for some observation piezometers from first layer, for different ones from second layer and so on. So far I obtain in GMS always only one residual, and I am neither sure from which layer it is.... Do you, or anyone else have suggestion how to solve this problem?
  2. Hi Alan, could I ask if this feature is now included in the recently upgraded version 10.4? Thanks
  3. Hi Bruce, thank you for sharing these settings. I have done one test on one of my models that is in NWT (around 2 million cells). Well, the model converged to me but I didn't get any significant improvement of the model runtime. Maybe the main benefit of those settings is for the model with even bigger size (as you had mention that your model consists of 8 mil cells) In any case thanks, once it can be certainly useful.
  4. Hello Bruce, Thank you for your advice. I expected a bit that the reply would be better PC , but I was interested if someone has any tricks or advices. At the end I decreased the cellsize of the grid (to one third – around 800 000), and got to the running time around an hour. In this way I am losing the high resolution which was necessary for my project, but at least I am able to work on calibration of model in some reasonable model-running time. I would be really interested in your NWT solver set-up as I am dealing many times with the models with the size in this order of ma
  5. Hi everyone, I would like to ask about the length of the computational time of the transient model. I have built already several more complex models, but my transient models never exceeded 1 or max 2 hours to be finished. Not this time. I had built (I have to admit rather big model) with the number of the cells around 3 000 000. As flow package there is used HUF and as the solver PCG2. For the steady state my model finishes somewhere at the 10th iteration with the total computational time around 7 min. Built on that is the transient model with 27 stress periods. From previous e
×
×
  • Create New...