Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Jonas

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

749 profile views
  1. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    Now I try to run the RANDPAR utility in the command prompt but get the error message "Cannot open covariance matrix file hk_12.matrix."
  2. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    The exact error message while running PEST with NSMC is "cannot open parameter value file m20s20000_random_nul1.par". If someone has an idea on this error message it would be very appreciated.
  3. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    Thanks Michal and Julian for your replies. Eventually I might end up running PEST outside of GMS if it does not work. I managed to get a parameter estimation run with svd-assist to work. I also managed to get a PEST NSMC run to work. But, when I want to repeat the procedure with fixed pilot points I get a message: "Cannot find sm20s20000_random_nul1.par". I cannot find the corresponding file in the folder of the model file neither. As I wrote in my first post I find it quite arbitrary when PEST works together with GMS. I would be happy with a response from someone from GMS's developing team on this issue.
  4. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    Thanks for your quick reply Michal, I agree on that it seems like PEST is doing its job but GMS does not read in the result properly. But I can't find the reason for this since the same modelling procedure has worked for other models. Quite frustrating. How do use the PARREP utility? Should I use it outside of GMS interface? Kind regards, Jonas
  5. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    This is what typically happens when running with SVD-assist. As can be seen from the blue marked line, PEST is able to reduce the error to 98.885 from the initial error of 155.76. But, then something goes wrong since this solution never comes up as a iteration before the parameter estimation is finished.
  6. PEST, SVD and SVD-assist

    I often experience problems when running a PEST parameter estimation model with SVD-assist. I find it quite arbitrary when it work and when it does not work. For some occasions it seems to work just by moving the modelling files to another computer and run the model on that workstation. For my current model, SVD works but SVD-assist does not. To reach reasonable results with NSMC is even more problematic, in particular for transient models. I run the latest nightly build and NWT as solver. Someone with similar experiences or suggestions to a more streamlined and stable model procedure?
  7. Kriging with logarithmic semivariogram

    Hi Julian, I decided to use another variogram method than the semi-logarithmic for the cases when I got the error. If you have problems with the Kriging procedure, have you tried one of the recent nightly builds?
  8. Stress periods defined as dates/times

    Unfortunately I still experience the stress-periods as quite buggy. The images below show stress periods as date/times and as seconds respectively. The result is from a PEST NSMC simulation with a transient pump-test as calibration target. During the initial forward runs and PEST calibration without NSMC I did not experience the same issue with the date-time series. The simulation itself seems to work fine but the problem arises when creating graphs and comparing the simulated results with my observations. Since I think there is a bug behind the issue I would appreciate if someone from the GMS development team could look into it. Kind regards Jonas
  9. Stress periods defined as dates/times

    Thank's Dirk. You advice worked for me as well.
  10. Hi, I experience the tool for defining stress periods as dates/times as quite buggy. Please refer to screenshot below. First, there is a different format between the first row and the second two rows (month as number "10" instead of letters "Oct"). But the most significant issue is that the "length" changes to weird numbers when the date and time is changed. In the example below the first stress period has a negative number but I have also experienced zero as length. My workaround has been to not make changes as date/times by unmarking the "use dates/times" box, calculate the corresponding length between and then change back to "use dates/times". This works but not so convenient. Another issue is that I have seconds as time format in my model but to get the length right I have to divide the seconds by 2 in the "length" box to get the date/times right. Finally, the model terminates with an error when I use date/times but works when I am un-tickning the box mentioned above (not using date/times). Any ideas on how to get these issues sorted out? Kind regards, Jonas
  11. I use Kriging and variograms to describe spatial variability of pilot points for HK and RCH in a PEST parameter estimation simulation. I use the log values for both HK and RCH. For one pilot point set it works perfectly fine to use a logarithmic semivariogram, which also looks reasonable. These HK values are in the range between 1e-4 to 1e-6 m/sek. For pilot point sets with lower values (in the range between 1e-8 and 1e-10) I get the following message when I try to build a logarithmic semivariogram: Warning. There were no points calculated; bad lag parameters! A semivariogram (that is not logarithmic) does however allow me to build a variogram. I have two questions: 1. What is the reason for this warning? 2. Would it be a significant difference in interpolation between a semivariogram and a logarithmic semivariogram? I am happy to receive any comments and ideas on these issues. Kind regards, Jonas
  12. PEST and Kriging

    Thanks Alan, the nightly build solved the issue.
  13. PEST and Kriging

    Hi, When i customize the variogram for the pilot points of the HK-field in the nsmc I and II tutorials, and also in my own models, I encounter the problem showed in the attached figure. It seems like the whole field is generated from only one point and not all available ones. I also edited the already set up variogram in the tutorials, and then changed back to its original form and still got the same problem. Any ideas on how to solve this issue? Kind regards, Jonas
  14. Null Space Monte Carlo

    For others interested in this issue, the support team has now fixed the bug that caused the issue of PEST and null space MC with the NWT solver. Download the latest nightly build (Jan 25th) from: http://www.aquaveo.com/downloads-gms Woodward, it was a pleasure to read your article, "Uncertainty in the modelling of spatial and temporal patterns of shallow groundwater flow paths: The role of geological and hydrological site information" in Journal of Hydrology where you have applied this method.
  15. Null Space Monte Carlo

    Thank you Alan, I have done so. Looking forward for their response. Woodward, the more simplified converges in almost all cases. The problem is that non-unique grids are created.