Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

khaled_haider

Members
  • Content Count

    32
  • Joined

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About khaled_haider

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Syria (Damascus)

Recent Profile Visitors

1,159 profile views
  1. Hello, I encountered a problem when I was trying to download Online Maps because the "Advanced button" is missed from "Get Online Maps" dialoge. I am using GMS 10.4.2. Any suggestions please.
  2. did you try to increase the number of time steps for that stress peroid ? it may help !
  3. I've faced the same problem with the ArcGIS 10.4.1. But it worked perfectly with an old version of ArcGIS, namely the version 10.2.
  4. Hi mina, you can compute the flow in and out of each part using two methods: 1- You can interactively select the cells of each part, and then compute the flow budget only for those selected cells and see the flow values for each part under the “HEAD DEP BOUNDS”. 2- You can define Zone Budget IDs for each part, either directly on the 3D Grid, or using a new coverage in the conceptual model and converting the conceptual model to Grid model. You have then to re-run the model and re-compute the Flow Budget. You can then see the flow budget for each zone,which in this case represents your
  5. Hi Mark, first, I recommend you to use the Arc Hydro Groundwater (AHGW) from Aquaveo, which enables you to simply import the simulation results (including Draw down) into ArcGIS. If you don’t want to do that, you can follow the following tedious steps: 1- Go the project explorer- 3D grid data, and select the “top” in Global package to make it the active dataset. 2- Right click on the 3Dgird icon and then export the 3D grid as a shapefile (grid.shp). 3- In the windows of Export 3D Grid to shapefile select the “Active cells” and “Active dataset”, which in you
  6. Thank you Alan for your reply I was working with the version MODFLOW-2005. When I switched to MODFLOW 2000 it worked perfectly, as shown in the figure below.
  7. Hi, Does anyone know why my GMS- MODFLOW Solution did not calculate the different type of errors e.g., Sum of Squared Weighted Residual (Head + Flow), as shown in this dialog ?. Thanks.
  8. Hello, did anyone notice that the option "Mark flooded cells" does not work in GMS- Version 10.3.6 ? or there is something wrong with me ?
  9. Dear GMS- development team, I was wondering if you you please could add the following options to the output control dialog: 1-Layer thickness. 2-Saturated thickness. 3-Depth to the water table below land surface. thanks
  10. Hello Niklas Jannok, I do not know how many errors do you get when you run the Model checker, but if the number is not very large, you can manually modify the bottom elevation of the cells that cause the errors. But it is recommended not to change the stream elevations.
  11. Hello, I was wondering if the computations using GMS-DATA CALCULATOR could be limited to only some selected cells of a 2D-Grid data set (and not for all cells of the dataset). Because sometimes I want to change the values of some cells that intersect with specific arcs or polygons and not all cells. thanks
  12. Hello, I was wondering if the computations using GMS-DATA CALCULATOR could be limited to only some selected cells of a 2D-Grid data set (and not for all cells of the dataset). Because sometimes I want to change the values of some cells that intersect with specific arcs or polygons and not all cells. thanks
  13. Thank you Calberts for answering my question. You helped me a lot. I was a little confused with the shortcut of the Unit of Discharge in Cubic meter per second “CMS”. I am used to the abbreviation m3/s.
  14. Hello, Does anyone know the cause or the meaning of this message” Event … is over due to flow below cutoff value” which appears in WMS Model Wrapper?
  15. Thanks Chris, I did not notice any significant change in my results when using a Time step = 300 seconds, except for a significant shortcut in the time necessary to complete the simulation. This encouraged me to try even greater values of time steps (for example 600 seconds) to see how this increase can affect the results. Nevertheless, one must be very careful when implementing this increase and must monitor all types of outputs and not focus on a specific output.
×
×
  • Create New...