Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

About calberts

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

2,591 profile views
  1. calberts

    Satellite image doesn't match with scatter data.

    Hi, It definitely looks like there is a projection issue with one of the pieces of data. Whenever I have similar issues, the first step I take is to locate which of the two is actually in the correct location. The easiest way to do this is to load in a dynamic map to provide a reference for where things are located. To load in a dynamic map, select "Add online maps" from the "Web" menu and choose "World Imagery" or "World Street map". SMS will display a dynamic map that updates when you pan around and zoom into the display. After you have located which one is correct, double check the specified projection on the one that is wrong by right clicking on it and checking the object projection. If the object projection of the object in the incorrect location seems correct, then more investigation is needed from the source of that data. Sometimes there are conversion factors such as a shift or scaling that must be applied, speaking to the surveyor or person that generated the data can sometimes clear that up. If after investigating the source of the data doesn't resolve the issue, then a trial and error process of manually shifting the data by applying either scale factors or X and Y shifts will be required. Most projections parameter fields that you can adjust within the projection (see below). -Cody
  2. calberts

    Extracting Flow Depth Time-series

    David, If you have not already figured, this out. I agree that looking at the depth contours is may be the best idea. You can customize the contour interval and range to a desirable setting. (i.e. you can modify the contour options to create a single contour line at the 0.001 depth) And then afterwards save out a CAD file of the contour lines by selecting File | Save as... then in the "Save as..." dialog you can change the "Save as type" to DWG or DXF. The contour line will be saved in a CAD layer for the current time step that is visible in the display. If you want to do multiple time steps, you would need to change the time being viewed and repeat the steps for each individual time. -Cody
  3. calberts

    Extracting Flow Depth Time-series

    Hi David, You may want to look into monitoring gages for the 2D grid. After you have loaded in the solution, you can use the "Create monitoring gage" tool circled in green in the image below to create a gage anywhere in the grid, such as the one shown circled in red. Then, you can use the "Select monitoring gage" to double click on the gage and it will display a plot for the 2D grid dataset, such as the one displayed in the image. Now, unfortunately this does not exactly give you a rate at which the depressions are filling, but it does show the computed depths on the cell over time so it does give you an indication of what is going on in the cell. For the second inquiry, I am not sure that I know exactly what kind of built in tool you are thinking of for visualizing the connectivity. Could you provide a little more detail on what you are wanting to see? It may be that there are already other ways to accomplish what you want to see. -Cody
  4. Jim, As a follow-up, is it that the triangles that are automatically generated are undesirable and you have to delete them and create the triangles by hand? You may consider using breaklines, which can allow you to easily control the triangulation to force the triangles to behave how you want them to. Here are a few links on breaklines that may be helpful: https://www.xmswiki.com/wiki/SMS:Breaklines_Workflow https://www.xmswiki.com/wiki/SMS:Breaklines -Cody
  5. Jim, I see that we have an option for the opposite of what you want (when a vertex is deleted we can specify whether SMS retriangulates the void or not) in the Scatter Options of the Scatter menu. However, I am unaware of an option to specify whether SMS retriangulates when adding a vertex. I have submitted a feature request to our development team for them to consider adding this as an option to future releases. -Cody
  6. Hi Jim, The .map file contains the materials coverage. If you load that into the new project it will load in all the map coverages that were included in the original project and you can delete the ones you don't want. In SMS 12.2, the limitation to this method is if the materials coverage is one of the coverages that use the new dynamic model interface (DMI) such as an SRH-2D materials coverage, the attributes and coverage type will be lost and only the polygon geometry will be loaded in. You can easily get around that DMI limitation and ensure that the attributes are preserved in one of two ways: The first way is nice if you are starting a new project from scratch. You would make a duplicate of the project you are working on, open the duplicate and delete out all the stuff you don't want in the new project you are building, except for the materials coverage. This will ensure that none of the materials attributes The second way is nice if you already have a project and you just want to add a new materials coverage. You would select the materials coverage to make it the active (bolded) coverage, select File | Save as... and then change the Save as type to "Shapefile". In the export options you will select Feature Polygons -> Polygon Shapefile. This will create a polygon shapefile that can be opened in the new project and converted back to a map coverage by right clicking on it and selecting Convert | Shapes -> Feature Objects. This will start open the a wizard to walk you through the conversion process. If you specify the material attribute in the shapefile as "Material" in the GIS to Feature Objects Wizard ---- Step 1 of 1window, the material type will be preserved and transferred to the coverage. -Cody
  7. calberts

    display materials on mesh?

    Hi Dale, I can see the concern. The old way of viewing materials assigned to the elements was definitely an easy way to see the element material assignments. We are always looking at improving our users experience with the software so I have made some notes that I will send them to our development team. For the time being, you can adjust the elevations of the polygon nodes and vertices in the material coverage by interpolating your scatter set (if you have one loaded into the project) to the map data. To do this make the materials coverage the active coverage by clicking on it, switch to the scatter module, and then select Interpolate to map... from the Scatter menu. This will interpolate the scatter elevations to the map coverage and bring it from zero up to the level of the mesh. Now, this may still not be optimal for viewing as some of the polygons may protrude through the mesh surface, partially obscuring the elements, but that will depend on the data configuration. It may be just as helpful to just leave the polygon vertices and nodes at zero and turn off the mesh contours to view the mesh in plan view. -Cody
  8. calberts

    display materials on mesh?

    Hi Dale, With the new simulation based approach to modeling in SMS the material properties are no longer stored in the mesh for SRH-2D meshes. They are rather stored in the materials coverage and polygon material properties are then assigned to the underlying elements. An alternate way of seeing how the materials are getting assigned to the mesh would be to go to the "Map" section of the display options and turn on "Snap Preview". If the mesh and materials coverage are both linked to a simulation, then dotted lines will appear which show how the materials are being "draped" or assigned to the mesh elements. -Cody
  9. calberts

    Can SMS still prepare pre-processor files for SRH-2D?

    Dale, my mistake, I mentioned that you could run SRHPre with the "Partial Interface", which is Option 2. You are actually correct, if you use the .srhhydro you want to use option 3 which is the "Custom Interface". I am not sure what happened when you ran the custom interface as this should generate the three files you showed and the .DAT file should be complete and not 0kb in file size. I'd be curious to try and run it to see what happened. The renaming of the casename_SOF.dat file to casename_SIF.dat works with the SRHPre partial mode (Option 2) as you have noticed, but that requires that you have already ran SRHPre previously, since SRHPre is what spits out the casename_SOF.dat file. In the end, it looks like that workflow worked for you...although I'm still wondering why the custom interface did not work using the SRHHYDRO file... -Cody Yes, catbert is fine haha, that's a first
  10. calberts

    Can SMS still prepare pre-processor files for SRH-2D?

    Dale, In SMS 12.2, you can export the simulation files without launching by right clicking on the simulation and choosing "Export". This will export all the simulation files to a sub directory where your SMS project files are stored. Dig down to the folder which has the name of the simulation you created in SMS and the exported files are there. You can use the .srhhydro file (alongside the other exported files) to run SRHPre in the partial interface mode from a command line. Let me know if you run into any dead ends and I can shed some light on the process. I believe there are plans for future releases of SMS to allow you to run a simulation without locking you out of the SMS project. -Cody
  11. calberts

    multiple SRH-2D obstructions in same simulation?

    Looks like we posted at the same time. Glad you figured it out. -Cody
  12. calberts

    multiple SRH-2D obstructions in same simulation?

    Hi Dale, It sounds like you are creating multiple coverages for the different obstructions? Try creating all of the obstructions in the same coverage. You can merge coverages by selecting both in the project explorer while holding down the shift key and then right clicking on the two selected coverages and selecting "Merge coverages". Let me know if this is not helpful and I may have a few more ideas. -Cody
  13. calberts

    Link Boundary Condition

    WIALLEN, I have not had any issues with it stalling to date. If you click on the PreSRH-2D line of the SMS model wrapper (shown below) is there any error message displayed? If not, what are the last f ew lines of the model wrapper saying while it is stalled out? -Cody
  14. calberts

    Exporting Geometry into RAS

    mikeg20, it is difficult to say what the issue could be just from what the translator gives us in this screenshot. I would recommend contacting Aquaveo Technical Support at support@aquaveo.com. They can set up a file share link where you can upload your project and have them take a closer look as to what may be causing this issue. -Cody
  15. Currently GMS reports an Error if negative values are input for the FEMWATER hydraulic conductivity tensor values. We have recently learned that in some cases these values can be negative. This feature request is to change GMS so that instead of reporting an error, a warning message will be displayed. A warning message would still be nice, since from our understanding most cases will only have positive values in the tensor. -Cody