Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum

C. Moebus

Members
  • Content Count

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

C. Moebus last won the day on June 8 2011

C. Moebus had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About C. Moebus

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

4,028 profile views
  1. Have you tried the LMG-solver instead? The PCGN-solver did not convince me mostly..
  2. The slow link in the model execution is most probably that you are not using a parallel version of MODFLOW (Check option in MODFLOW Global/Basic Package) or a not parallelised solver (LMG or PCGN). 2 x 12 processors = 24 processors - makes a max. of 4% usage per core if not parallelised...
  3. I will be a very helpful feature enhancement when using the DRT-Package to be able to select the Return-Points, Return-Arcs or Return-Polygons in the Map Coverage. At the moment one has to do that Cell based in the Modflow Menu and repeat this again everytime something is changed and mapped at the DRT-Coverage
  4. One major feature of MOFLOW-USG - besides the horizontal local refinement - is the possibility of being able to split cells vertically instead of splitting complete layers. At the moment, you can only split complete layers vertically, but it will be very helpful, being able to split only selected cells vertically, no matter in which layer you are. Being able to create a conceptual model, where you can create such a model (e. g. vertical and/or horizontal refinement around a well, vertical and/or horizontal refinement along selected boundaries like rivers etc.) automatically will be v
  5. This will be a helpful feature, as this is sometimes the case at our site also. Also to be able to generate Map polygons from other model features, like conductivity, recharge, etc. and to be able to create river, stream boundaries etc. from the model data in the Map coverages will be helpful.
  6. I am missing it also. It is unfortunately due to cost cuts of Aquaveo. Being able, to add own WMS-services with an adapted advanced button was still very helpful!!!
  7. Any updates on the Integration of that feature request?
  8. Yes, this is a bug, that exists unfortuantely since 10.3.6 !
  9. This is a good idea and support this feature request - it will be helpful!
  10. This will be very helpful - I have required this also quite a lot of times...I hope it comes soon
  11. GMS could report the cell id or cell IJK value where the particle was created in the pathline report instead - this will be an even more standardized approach
  12. The newly released MT3D-USGS integrate a lot of very helpful features for solvant transport and therefor it will be great, when it can be integrated into GMS quite quickly... See: http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/mt3d-usgs/
  13. As 3.5 years have past, can you give an update on the integration of this "overdue enhancement"
  14. Sometimes we work with SRTM data as DEM for regional Groundwater models and these Datasets are very large (converting them to Scatter Points creates 36,000,000 points each). As these SRTM data have sometimes errors, we have to change some Z-values, delete points and add other points or calculate the z-values. All this is only possible with scatter data and not with raster.
×
×
  • Create New...