Jump to content
GMS, SMS, and WMS User Forum


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Kirk

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  1. GMS Solids to Modflow, HUF, and K

    Thanks Alan. The model I am working with was created by a co-worker, so I am not exactly sure of the sequence of his steps. He seemed to imply that first he used the Solids to HUF command, and then the Solids to MODFLOW command, but with the HUF package selected as the flow package. In the resulting model, I can select a plan view and layer, and in the Display menu turn "cell faces" on. Now, I see four colors of cells, that match the four colors in the materials editor. It seems as though, then, each cell is simply one of the four assigned material HK values. Is that the fact then? If you care to have a look, a file was uploaded to aquaveo's file cloud, and my password to folder was assigned to me as aquaveoKW, uploaded April 19th (13 days ago). The file I uploaded is named ML12-15-16_R1_KW.zip.
  2. The GMS instructions show that using Solids to MODFLOW, Grid overlay with Keq you should get this custom K values assigned to cells, and in that section of there is this neat little image I embedded in this message. It seems like a GMS/MODFLOW user would like to be able to tell what K is actually assigned to each cell in a case like this. But, in GMS, using the HUF package, no K appears for cell-properties when right clicking a cell in the model. It says some parameters are in the Materials-editor. But, how can we see what the intermediate, customized K values are? One of our group noted that this image have used such data to have been created! So how did you get these values out of the model?? Is there some method or steps that I can use to say, export K for layer 4, for example? Thanks for any tips provided! Kirk
  3. ET surface

    A final note: Thanks for the assistance. I followed the steps provided by Alan, and found that the virtually the exact same elevations were reproduced in my MODFLOW ET package as using my copy and paste method. Nice demonstration of how well the software works with elevation datasets. I actually had saved the USGS NED dataset as 2D Scatter points, so just interpolated that product onto the 2D Grid. This worked great. Kirk
  4. ET surface

    Thanks for your detailed reply, Alan, I appreciate this. I will see if I can get that method to work. I am in a testing phase at the moment, working out my methodology for applying the ET in the model. Meanwhile, I just emailed Kyle at Aquaveo a solution that also seemed to work. Here is what I wrote Kyle: Well, I think I have succeeded in getting my elevations placed in the ET package. I simply went to MODFLOW – Global – Top in the Project explorer, and selected “properties.” I clicked on the upper left cell to “select all” of the array. I then opened MODFLOW – ET – ET Surface and again selected all, and used “paste.” It seems to have populated my ET array with surface elevations. That is what I had in mind, so I believe I am good-to-go. However, if you do find a better way to do it, why please let me know. Or, if what I did is not OK for some reason, please let me know that too. Alan, if you think my method might cause me problems, please let me know.
  5. ET surface

    Hi. I am attempting to apply the concepts Alan L. and Rob have brought up. One problem is that I do not know what a U-GRID is. Also, Alan your method sounds very straight forward. But can you possibly explain the steps a little more? How do I interpolate the ET surface to a matching 2D grid? I tried just selecting "grid" in the Project Explorer, and "Convert to" 2D grid, but no top elevation seemed to come into the 2D grid. I need more detailed instructions, but can always revert to entering them all manually. Meanwhile, Kyle with Aquaveo support sent me some instructions too. I'll call Kyle and see if perhaps he can walk me through the steps. Kirk W.
  6. ET surface

    Alan L., see also Rob Virtue's note below. Thanks Rob for sending this workaround, in case Alan's method seems problematic. Alan, indeed the 2D dataset to Array function is greyed out in my GMS application, as noted by Rob. I will try your approach, with the hope that if I have a 2D dataset created and turned on, then the function may be available (i.e. not greyed out). I'll give it a try. I have sent the files to Aquaveo technical support, maybe they will show me the same thing. Kirk
  7. ET surface

    Replying to my own topic here... Or is ET surface simply the top of layer one, and elevation of zero is related to that surface?
  8. ET surface

    I would like to set up ET for a surface defined by a tin (based on DEM), but when I create a coverage, it seems to just ask for "ET Elevation". Can I select a surface to set ET elevations for individual model cells within a larger polygon?
  9. GMS 8.0 Display Options

    Follow up Note: Todd at Aquaveo submitted this as a bug to the developers of GMS on 9/2-2011. Also he suggested a work around of using a high number of contour intervals with the number of contours option with Block Fill. Kirk
  10. GMS 8.0 Display Options

    In GMS 7.1.2 I could map my HK data by simply using the cell faces button and options dialogue box to specify "active data set" and "IBOUND" and then auto-compute would give me a nice varied display of HK. Even with somewhat unbalanced HK distributions. In GMS 8.0.8 and 8.0.9 (both) the cell faces options button is no longer there, and instead there is a block fill function in the contour options dialogue box. But the auto-compute will not generate a nice distribution that could be attained in GMS 7.1.2, and even when I specify values for specific HK numbers, I get several values of HK mapped as only one color - at least sometimes! Can anyone tell me how to work this new block fill to work like the old cell faces options worked??
  11. I used the solids to modflow method to assign materials in GMS 7.1.2. As is presently set up, if you select cells and then click properties, you can change some values, but if you have assinged K with materials, it is un-editable in this manner. I later decided to convert to K values and just use the materials and solids as a guide to get me started with assigning K values. This worked OK, but it would have been nice to be able to quickly select groups of cells of a particular material and re-assign them to another material, much as you can do by selecting cells and changing K values. With this capability, it would be relatively easy to test layering and material effects in MODFLOW without having to keep trying to recreate solids in exactly the way you want by creating numerous psuedo boreholes. I even tried changing cell values by using the EDIT/Materials/Edit button, but this list, which had i and j cells transposed, could not seem to change the material in a single cell. Obviously, even if it did work, this is slow and tedious compared to just selecting some cells and changing the material, were it to be possible.
  12. 2D Scatter points

    Thanks to the Aquaveo support team for finding the root of this problem on my computer. I have ordered a new graphics card after you determined the one in my computer had a history of problems with GMS. Kirk
  13. 2D Scatter points

    I have a gms project that when I open in version 7.1.2, 2D scatter points are visible and behave as expected. IN version 7.1.6, they do not display, and if I map to TIN they give unexpected results. Any suggestions? I sent the file to Tech Support.